ဘာလို့Trumpသည် ICE ဆန္ဒပြုမှုများအပေါ်အပြုသဘောပြိုင်ကွပ်မှုအက်ဥပဒေကိုအသုံးပြုခြင်းသည်အလွန်စိုးရိမ်စရာဖြစ်လိမ့်မည်နည်း

(SeaPRwire) –   ဤဆောင်းပါးသည် TIME ၏နိုင်ငံရေးသတင်းလိပ်စာဖြစ်သော The D.C. Brief ၏အစိတ်အပိုင်းတစ်ခုဖြစ်သည်။ သင့်အကောင့်သို့ဤကဲ့သို့သောသတင်းများပို့ရန် ကိုစာရင်းသွင်းပါ။

သမ္မတ Donald Trump သည်ဗင်နီဇွဲလာတွင်အမေရိကန်စစ်ဖွဲ့များ၏စွမ်းရည်ကိုမြင်ခဲ့သည်။ ထိုနိုင်ငံ၏ခေါင်းဆောင်ကိုသူ that nation’s leader and hauled him to New York on drug and weapons charges. Now Trump is mulling the use of the same military power to quiet the unrest in Minneapolis. It is a potentially stunning escalation by the President over a spiraling scene in which much of the public views his Administration as the instigators.

ခွန်အားကြီးမားလာသော Trump သည်မင်နီဆိုတားတွင်ထိန်းချုပ်မှုမရှိသွားသောလူဝင်မှုကြီးကြပ်ရေးစီးကျော်များကိုဆန့်ကျင်နေသည့်ဆန္ဒပြသူများနှင့်အတူအခြေအနေကိုပိုမိုပြင်းထန်စေရန်အလိုရှိနေပုံရသည်။ ပြီးခဲ့သည့်အပတ်တွင်ဓာတ်ပုံရိုက်ကူးသူများထံမှပြေးထွက်နေစဉ် 37 နှစ်အရွယ်အမျိုးသမီးတစ်ဦးသည်မျက်နှာတွင် in the face last week while driving away from officers and a second man was shot . Trump on Thursday threatened to trigger a rarely used 1797 that allows for a President to deploy troops on U.S. soil to quell an insurrection or armed rebellion—tasks members of the military are typically barred from being involved in.

If Minnesota officials did not stop the protests, Trump he would “institute the INSURRECTION ACT, which many Presidents have done before me, and quickly put an end to the travesty that is taking place in that once great State.”

ဤသည်သည်သမိုင်းကာလကြာမှအကျိုးကျေးဇူးအနည်းငယ်မျှသာရှိသည့်အချိန်ဖြစ်သည်ဟုဆိုရန်အလွန်အကျွံမဟုတ်ပါ။ အနည်းဆုံးမကြာသေးမီကမှတ်မိသောအချိန်များတွင်မဟုတ်ပါ။ ဗုဒ္ဓဟူးနေ့တွင်အဖြူရောင်အိမ်တွင်သူမ၏သတင်းပေးပွဲအတွင်းသတင်းကင်းရေးမှူး Karoline Leavitt သည် Trump ၏ရှေ့နောက်သမ္မတများသည် Insurrection Act ၏စွမ်းရည်များကို “sparingly” အသုံးပြုခဲ့ကြောင်းအသိအမှတ်ပြုခဲ့သော်လည်း၎င်းသည်ထိုသို့ဖြစ်သော်လည်းကိရိယာတစ်ခုအဖြစ်မဆုတ်မနပ်နေဆဲဖြစ်ကြောင်းထပ်မံပြောကြားခဲ့သည်။ 

For the history nerds reading: we are currently in the longest stretch in U.S. history that the country has gone without the Insurrection Act being invoked.

The last time a U.S. President invoked the powers to put down an insurrection was 1992, when George H.W. Bush heeded the call from California’s Governor to help calm the streets of Los Angeles after a jury acquitted four police officers who were filmed beating Rodney King. Before that, Presidents Eisenhower, Kennedy, and Johnson each deployed troops to enforce Civil Rights protections. The last time the act was invoked without a state’s ask was 1965, when LBJ stepped in to protect the Selma-to-Montgomery Civil Rights march in Alabama.

It’s a safe bet that if Trump were to trigger his emergency powers, it would not be at the invitation of Minnesota, where residents are furious about the situation and Gov. Tim Walz likened the moment to an “occupation” in a rare six-minute address Wednesday night. 

“What’s happening in Minnesota right now defies belief,” Walz said. “News reports simply don’t do justice to the level of chaos and disruption and trauma the federal government is raining down upon our communities.”

Despite calls from Walz to make a showing “of decency, of justice, of community, and of peace,” the situation is spiraling. Protests are spreading across the country, other blue states are bracing for retribution, and immigrant communities are increasingly living in fear. In Minnesota, many are either canceling classes or going remote.

Meanwhile, Homeland Security officials are showing their teeth, with Secretary Kristi Noem implying to the media that the crackdowns could escalate by the slogan emblazoned on her podium: “One of Ours, All of Yours.”

Setting aside the ramifications for public rights, First Amendment protections, and public safety, nothing about this carries an obvious political upside for Trump. In fact, quite the opposite; CNN polling just 26% of American adults view the shooting of Renee Good as appropriate, similar to the sentiment found in surveys by Yahoo-YouGov (27%) and Quinnipiac (35%). The CNN and Yahoo polls both suggest Trump’s mass deportation regime has become wildly unpopular. CNN’s poll found Americans think the ICE raids are making things “less safe” by a margin of 51% to 31%; Yahoo reported that the actions are “doing more harm than good” by a 54% to 34% spread. Objectively, this is not where any political actor wants to be.

None of this seems to be registering at the White House, where an emboldened Trump is basking in the success of a mission that captured Venezuela’s autocratic leader and ferried him to New York, plus the tremors over his to seize Greenland, and looming with Iran. 

During his first term, Trump was pulled back by advisers from invoking the Insurrection Act. It’s not clear if anyone around him is providing such advice now, leaving bellicose posturing from a President who may be about to test the limits of Midwest Nice, along with the country’s tolerance for the violent suppression of largely peaceful dissent.

Make sense of what matters in Washington. .